Document Date
17/04/2023
Created by
N/A
Category
Meetings
Document Date
17/04/2023
Created by
N/A
Category
Meetings
| Reference No. | For | Date granted |
| NW/23/00051 | IWC redevelopment of outbuildings/WC | 22/3 |
| NW/23/00055 | 1A St Marys Road additional parking | 22/3 |
| Reference No. | For | Date refused |
| None |
| Reference No. | For | Status |
| NW/23/00085 | 30 Dychurch Lane, solar panels & air source heat pump | Comment sent |
| NW/23/00164 | 5 Dag Lane, replacement windows | No comments sent |
| NW/23/00168 | 23-25 High Street, convert offices to flats | Comments sent |
| Reference No. | For | Status |
| NW/22/00321 | Nene Milling, 40 homes and village hall | Holding comment sent |
Comments sent:
Bozeat Parish Council object to this application. We have the following concerns:
Loss of Business Premises
Bozeat has very limited local employment opportunities and Arch Villas is one of the few remaining business premises within the village where a business could be established. The application contains no evidence that the site has been marketed for business use.
Parking – (JCS Policy 8 b ii)
The Northamptonshire Parking Standards for class C3 dwellings with 2 bedrooms sets a requirement of “2 spaces per dwelling, plus visitor spaces at 1 per dwelling across the development”. This equates to a requirement for 12 spaces for the scheme – more than double the 5 spaces proposed.
Bozeat has particularly high levels of car ownership because of the low level of local employment opportunities and poor public transport provision. The High Street already suffers from such acute parking problems that parking disputes have resulted in criminal damage to vehicles. The congested parking also resulted in frequent cases where refuse vehicles were unable to access Warners Hill. The High Street clearly cannot accommodate any of the overflow parking that the scheme would generate.
We are further concerned that when vehicles enter the site and find no empty spaces they would have insufficient space to turn and so be forced to reverse out unsighted onto the High Street.
Odour – (JCS Policy 8 e i)
The Okra Indian cuisine takeaway is the only fast food purveyor within the village. This is situated at 21 High Street which is adjacent to the proposal site (see photographs). The cooking odours generated by this business probably render at least part of the proposal site unsuitable for residential use.
Safety – (JCS Policy 8 b i)
Vehicles exiting the site would have inadequate visibility of oncoming vehicles or pedestrians on the High Street. The 1.5m wall could be shortened to address this on one side of the site but to do so would be detrimental to the street scene in which this wall along with that of the neighbouring property currently forms an attractive feature (see right hand picture above).
There is further concern that the doors to the takeaway open directly onto the entranceway. This means that not only is there regular pedestrian traffic across the entranceway, but when leaving the takeaway pedestrians could step directly onto the entranceway and into the path of a vehicle.
Amenity – (JCS Policy 8 e vi)
The new dwellings would have no amenity space.
The Parish Council recommends that this application should be refused. We further request that it is visited by the site viewing group.
A modified proposal has been submitted. Issues/comments already identified for our response are:
No response to date, a chasing email has been sent.
A draft response has been circulated for comment.